EPA proposes WPS Application Exclusion Zone updates

EPA proposes WPS Application Exclusion Zone updates

Upon publication of the Federal Register notice, the EPA will accept public comments on the proposed revisions for 90 days.


Per an announcement from the Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA proposed narrow updates to the Worker Protection Standard (WPS) regulation to improve the long-term success of the agency’s Application Exclusion Zone (AEZ) provisions.

Upon publication of the Federal Register notice, EPA will accept public comments on the proposed revisions for 90 days in docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0543.

View the prepublication version of the Federal Register notice containing the proposed updates here.

The targeted updates would improve enforceability for state regulators and reduce regulatory burdens for farmers. It would also maintain public health protections for farm workers and other individuals near agricultural establishments that could be exposed to agricultural pesticide applications. The proposed updates are consistent with the newly enacted 2019 Pesticide Registration Improvement Act.

Specifically, the EPA is proposing to:

  • Modify the AEZ so it is applicable and enforceable only on a farm owner’s property, where a farm owner can lawfully exercise control over employees and bystanders who could fall within the AEZ. As currently written, the off-farm aspect of this provision has proven very difficult for state regulators to enforce. These proposed changes would enhance both enforcement and implementation of the AEZ for state regulators and farm owners respectively. Off-farm bystanders would still be protected from pesticide applications thanks to the existing “do not contact” requirement that prohibits use in a manner that would contact unprotected individuals.
  • Exempt immediate family members of farm owners from all aspects of the AEZ requirement. This will allow farm owners and their immediate family members to decide whether to stay in their homes or other enclosed structures on their property during certain pesticide applications, rather than compelling them to leave even when they feel safe remaining.
  • Add clarifying language that pesticide applications that are suspended due to individuals entering an AEZ may be resumed after those individuals have left the AEZ.
  • Simplify the criteria for deciding whether pesticide applications are subject to the 25- or 100-foot AEZ.

For complete information about the WPS rule requirements, refer to the final WPS rule here. Find additional information about the WPS here.

SOURCE: Environmental Protection Agency