Thursday, October 30, 2014

Home News Minnesota court says drift is trespassing

Minnesota court says drift is trespassing

The Minnesota Court of Appeals rules that pesticide drift counts as trespassing

Associated Press | July 27, 2011

The Minnesota Court of Appeals says it can count as trespass under the law when pesticide drifts from one farm to another.
 
The appeals court revived a lawsuit by organic farmers Oluf and Debra Johnson against the Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. The Johnsons allege the co-op has repeatedly sprayed pesticides onto other fields that have drifted onto theirs, preventing them from selling their crops as organic.
 
The decision says no previous Minnesota case has addressed whether unwanted pesticide drift from a targeted field to an adjacent organic farm can constitute a trespass. The appeals court held Monday, July 25 that it can under some circumstances. Courts in other states have made similar rulings.
 
The appeals court sent the organic farmers' lawsuit back to a lower court for further action.

 

Top news

USDA announces $18 million in research grants

The funding will go to small businesses for research and development of agricultural innovations.

Second phase of gray water trials to begin at Texas A&M

The AgriLife center in Uvalde is studying the effect of gray water irrigation on several ornamental plant species.

EPA launches voluntary drift protection program

The star-rating program is designed to encourage the use of safer pesticide spray products.

Bailey Nurseries announces 2015 introductions

The Minnesota grower will introduce 20 new varieties next year.

EPA proposes removal of 72 chemicals from approved list

The chemicals would be removed from the list of substances approved for use as inert ingredients in pesticide products.

x